Skip to main content

WaterProof Camera Test


Test bench: Waterproof cameras – Ok, big shot, let’s see you swim
The manufacturers say these cameras are waterproof and shockproof and still able to take great photographs. We nip off to fetch a sledgehammer




Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT3

Does your toddler like a bit of experimental photography at bath time? Or are you a keen snorkeller? Then you’ll need a camera that operates underwater. Many claim to be waterproof and shockproof, but how do they perform in reality? We put five leading models to the test (see panel, right). This included the cameras being dropped 15ft onto sand, frozen in ice and taken into a swimming pool to shoot underwater.
Top of the class was this Panasonic, which shrugged off the challenges to produce superb results both above and below the waterline.
The controls are simple and its images were balanced and sharp, as was video footage. This shows the fallacy of going for maximum megapixels when you buy a camera, as the Lumix’s 12.1Mp sensor had the fewest in the test. The industrial appearance of the FT3 explains why it is the heaviest camera here, at 197g including battery, but this seemed to minimise damage — it emerged unscathed from the drop test but for a small jagged edge on its casing. That does not tarnish its hard-earned reputation as the toughest camera you can buy.
Price: £280 Buy now
Best for: Toughness
Verdict: A resilient superstar, but would leave a distinct dent in your bank balance.
panasonic.co.uk



Pentax Optio WG-1

If you conjured up a tough camera in your mind’s eye, this is what you might envisage. The case of this chunky 163g Pentax is swathed in thick rubber, and its buttons are solid — two features that enabled it to soak up punishing drops without sand infiltrating its nooks and crannies. The big freeze proved more of a problem, though: the battery displayed no signs of life until the camera had been warmed up.
Pentax pioneered waterproof cameras, but the WG-1, oddly, switched itself off during dives into the pool. It took images sluggishly underwater because its autofocus struggled, and refused to capture video. Images, too, were unimpressive generally.
Price: £210 Buy now
Best for: Rough and tumble
Verdict: Rugged in some respects but simply not good enough for the money.
pentax.co.uk



Fuji FinePix XP30 £125

This is the lowest-priced camera here — and it looks it. Nevertheless, the XP30 has decent specifications, including a 5x zoom, the biggest on test along with the Pentax’s.
This 165g Fuji displayed few signs of distress, other than the fact that it needed cajoling to switch on during the freeze test and sand had to be rinsed out of its crevices after it was dropped.
The camera functioned well underwater, though the images were a little soft and also rather grainy. Even so, while the Fuji is unexciting in photographic terms, it is only marginally inferior to the Olympus and withstood most of our tough challenges pretty well.
Price: £125
Best for: Value
Verdict: Cheap as chips and tough as old boots. Ideal for a teenager to fling about.
fujifilm.co.uk



Sony Cyber-Shot TX10

If the nearest you get to watersports is wiping rainwater off the lens, then this svelte Sony could well hit your sweet spot. It looks like a normal camera and, at 133g and less than 18mm thick, it is the most pocketable model here. Images were excellent — almost on a par with the Panasonic’s — with especially impressive tone and exposure levels. The problem is that the TX10 is simply not tough enough.
Its sliding lens cover panel got stuck during the freeze test and also after the drops, once sand had got lodged inside it, and even became misaligned at one point. The posh touchscreen, which activates most controls, proved nigh-on useless when damp, making the Sony impractical for wet work.
Price: £285
Best for: Style
Verdict: Classy compact that can take some bumps but is hardly robust.
sony.co.uk


Olympus Tough TG-310 £131

On the piste, size matters and, at 155g, this Olympus is both the lightest and also the thinnest camera tested here, apart from the Sony. The Olympus suffered few ill effects during the freeze test and its rubberised buttons help to disperse moisture, making it easy to operate while wet. The TG-310 proved robust outdoors, too, working well underwater and showing just a few small scratches after the drops.
Toughness aside, performance was more humdrum than Olympian, and the distinctly average images were a touch grainy. The flash is annoyingly overemployed, and the LCD screen is poor. But at this price, those are gripes, not deal-breakers.
Price: £131
Best for: Winter sports
Verdict: Solid all-rounder offering robustness and value rather than stellar performance.
olympus.co.uk



Hard knocks
How the cameras were tested
Each of these toughened cameras is sold on the promise of its ability to withstand physical punishment and so was subjected to a series of rigorous challenges. In each test, images were taken, which were later compared with others captured in more normal circumstances.
The Freeze: The makers claim their models are freezeproof down to -10C and so the cameras were placed in a freezer in individual containers filled with water so as to encase them in ice.
The Swim: These cameras are said to be waterproof down to 10ft or, in some cases, more than 30ft. Each was operated during a dive into a swimming pool to a depth of 3ft (to see the effect of a pressure change) and used for a longer period at 12ft while we wore diving gear.
The Drop: They are also supposed to be able to survive a drop of about 5ft onto a hard surface. In this final real-world test, each model was dropped 15ft onto a beach, which may have absorbed some of the impact but allowed us to assess whether sand grains has entered the camera’s nooks and crannies.
Prices are the best found online. Our “Best Buy” seal of approval goes to a product combining innovative features, quality and affordability. Based on original research conducted by Matt Tuffin for What Digital Camera.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jeremy Clarkson on Honda Accord Type S

Honda Accord Type S: I thought it looked humdrum. But wow! 'This car may be brown and as interesting to look at as the periodic table, but it goes like a scalded cock' Honda Accord Type S "There’s a sensation of quality on the inside. This is a car that doesn’t feel assembled. It feels as though it’s been hewn from one solid block of steel. It’s a Barbour jacket. It’s a Scottish mountain" Don’t you think it’s strange? You buy a BMW one day and you are told that it is the ultimate driving machine, that it is all about balance and grip and immediacy. Whereas the very next day you are told that exactly the same car is all about joy. It was designed and built to be happy and to make you happy as a result. Welcome to the world of advertising. Volkswagen’s advertising agency told us for years that its cars were very reliable. But then the agency decided that actually you don’t buy a VW because it’s well made; you buy one because it’s cheap. Right? So. Has there been a ...

Rolls-Royce Ghost

  You would have thought after a hundred years of practice the human being would be quite good at driving cars. Many of us are. Double mini roundabouts. Motorway slip roads. Entrances to multi-storey car parks. We can do them all while talking on the phone, eating a sandwich and thinking about having sex with a lady. But unfortunately an equal number are completely hopeless. Day in and day out I’m presented with a vast array of people who, to put it kindly, are to driving a car what Moira Stuart is to powerboat racing. Earlier this afternoon, I drove down the Fosse Way and the person in front, in a BMW — not a Peugeot — stopped at every roundabout and set off when an imaginary stopwatch in their head dictated they’d been stationary long enough. Yesterday, on the M25, I was overtaken by a chap in a Kia Picanto who was doing — at least — 95mph. This is 90mph faster than is prudent in such a terrible car. And, to make matters worse, he was swerving from lane to lane so violently that I ...

BMW 640d

After the recent and very sad deaths of six British soldiers in Afghanistan, questions were immediately asked about the worthiness of the Warrior armoured vehicle in which they were travelling when the bomb went off. And equally immediately they were answered. The Warrior fleet in Afghanistan was upgraded last June at a cost of more than half a million quid a pop, with armour better able to deal with an explosion and improved seating to protect those inside from the shockwave. The trouble is, of course, that the men who go to war in beach footwear and skirts know full well that this has happened and are now using bigger bombs. This means the Warriors will have to be upgraded again, which will mean more explosives are needed to blow them up. It’s a problem that’s faced military commanders since the dawn of time. And it’s a problem that will never end. Each time there’s a tragedy, coroners can point the finger of blame. They can accuse defence chiefs of penny-pinching and the en...